Minimal APIs vs MVC Controllers: Choosing the Best Option for Your .NET Project

When it comes to building APIs in .NET, developers have two main options: Minimal APIs and Controllers-based APIs. While both options can accomplish the same goal of creating a functional API, they differ in their approaches and the trade-offs they offer.

In this blog post, we will take a closer look at both approaches and explore the advantages and disadvantages of each.

What is a Minimal API?

As shown in our previous post, a Minimal API is a new feature introduced in .NET 6 that allows developers to create simple, single-file APIs without the need for controllers or configuration files. This approach is ideal for developers who want to create small APIs quickly and easily.

Minimal APIs are built using the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder namespace and are defined using a single endpoint configuration block. Here's an example of a simple Minimal API:

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);

var app = builder.Build();

app.MapGet("/", () => "Hello World!");

app.Run();

To learn more about how to get started with Minimal APIs, see our post.

What is a Controllers-based API?

A Controllers-based API is the traditional approach to building APIs in .NET. It involves creating controllers that handle HTTP requests and responses. Controllers-based APIs are more flexible than Minimal APIs, as they allow developers to separate concerns and organize code into separate files.

Here's an example of a simple Controllers-based API:

[ApiController]
[Route("[controller]")]
public class HelloController : ControllerBase
{
    [HttpGet]
    public IActionResult Get()
    {
        return Ok("Hello World!");
    }
}

In this example, we create a controller named HelloController that handles HTTP GET requests to the root endpoint (/) and responds with "Hello World!".

Advantages and Disadvantages of Minimal APIs

Minimal APIs offer several advantages over Controllers-based APIs:

Simplicity: Minimal APIs are easier to write and maintain than Controllers-based APIs. They require fewer files and less configuration, making them ideal for small projects and prototypes.
Performance: Minimal APIs are faster than Controllers-based APIs because they have fewer layers of abstraction. This can be a significant advantage in high-traffic scenarios.

However, Minimal APIs also have some disadvantages:

Limited Flexibility: Minimal APIs are designed to be simple, so they lack some of the features and flexibility of Controllers-based APIs. For example, they cannot handle complex data types or perform model validation.
Debugging: Because Minimal APIs are usually defined in a single file, debugging can be more challenging than with Controllers-based APIs, where code is organized into separate files. While there are workarounds in Minimal API that can improve maintainability and allow for endpoint separation across different files (such as using extension methods), it may not be as effective as the traditional approach of using controllers.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Controllers-based APIs

Controllers-based APIs offer several advantages over Minimal APIs:

Flexibility: Controllers-based APIs are more flexible than Minimal APIs because they allow developers to separate concerns and organize code into separate files. This makes it easier to handle complex data types and perform model validation.
Debugging: Controllers-based APIs are easier to debug than Minimal APIs because code is organized into separate files.

However, Controllers-based APIs also have some disadvantages:

Complexity: Controllers-based APIs are more complex than Minimal APIs. They require more files and configuration, making them more challenging to write and maintain.
Performance: Controllers-based APIs are slower than Minimal APIs because they have more layers of abstraction. This can be a significant disadvantage in high-traffic scenarios.

Conclusion

Both Minimal APIs and Controllers-based APIs offer advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the project.

Minimal APIs are ideal for small projects and prototypes that require simplicity and performance. They are easy to write and maintain, but they lack some of the features and flexibility of Controllers-based APIs.

On the other hand, Controllers-based APIs are ideal for larger projects that require flexibility and maintainability. They are more complex than Minimal APIs and require more files and configuration, but they offer greater flexibility and ease of debugging.

In summary, both Minimal APIs and Controllers-based APIs have their place in the .NET ecosystem, and developers should choose the one that best fits their project's requirements. The decision should be based on factors such as project size, complexity, and performance requirements. By understanding the trade-offs of each approach, developers can choose the right one for their needs and build high-quality APIs in .NET.

DotNetWay